Damning Evidence of Buffett Role in 9/11

The following is snipped from Government plans to use Flight 93 cockpit tapes in Moussaoui trial:

An official for NetJets, a company that sells shares in private business aircraft, confirmed that the plane tracking Flight 93 belonged to the company. The official, who asked not to be identified by name, said the company was asked not to comment on the Sept. 11 flight but would not say who made the request.

The owner of NetJets is one Warren Buffett who has already been linked to 9-11 due to the fact that A) GW went to see Warren first, at USSTRATCOM at Offut AFB and B) Buffett has his hands in remote pilotting via Mitre Corporation AND Berkshire Hathaway (pertinent given the experts that have sworn that the 9-11 planes were remote pilotted) and C) Buffett was entertaining at least one CEO (she watched one plane smack right into her office) from the WTC on 9-11 at USSTRATCOM whose command has been merged with USSPACECOM’s (NORAD – explaining the synchronous convenience to the perpetrators of that terrorism that NORAD never reacted) to provide a singular command system under the technical management of SI International.

A former fellow researcher wrote:

I heard the announcement when they officially confirmed this, months ago. What’s really odd, to my thinking, is the fact that it was all secret to begin with. They let a whole year go by in which there are all these credible stories from eyewitnesses that they saw a second plane, but it was denied up and down. Then the truth comes out that there was one, that it was owned by Buffet, that it was authorized to track the hijacked plane…

The second wealthiest billionaire in the UNITED STATES has a lot of explaining to do. Executive jets do not track commercial aircraft. How can it be that NORAD does not make a 911 showing but this private jet does? 

This is one of the most important insights into the basic architecture of the 911 crimes. This alone could unravel these heinous crimes. 

Clearly MITRE (Buffett has “donated” to them in the past) has the technological know how to pull off remote piloting of the 911 planes and it seems safe to presume that Netjets has similar access since it’s a Berkshire Hathaway company, as well as the capability of shooting down FLIGHT 93. One engine of 93 was found six miles away from the crash site. All of the professional liars of major media expect us to believe that this engine bounced along the ground for those six miles!! Buffett’s jet seems to be the only culprit for the FLIGHT 93 shoot down.

An ACTUAL Expert:

The cell phone calls from the aircraft could not have happened. I am a National Security Agency trained Electronic Warfare specialist, and am qualified to say this. My official title: MOS33Q10, Electronic Warfare Intercept Strategic Signal Processing/Storage Systems Specialist, a highly skilled MOS which requires advanced knowledge of many communications methods and circuits to the most minute level. I am officially qualified to place severe doubt that ordinary cell phone calls were ever made from the aircraft. 

It was impossible for that to have happened, especially in a rural area for a number of reasons. 

When you make a cell phone call, the first thing that happens is that your cell phone needs to contact a transponder. Your cell phone has a max transmit power of five watts, three watts is actually the norm. If an aircraft is going five hundred miles an hour, your cell phone will not be able to 1. Contact a tower, 2. Tell the tower who you are, and who your provider is, 3. Tell the tower what mode it wants to communicate with, and 4. Establish that it is in a roaming area before it passes out of a five watt range. This procedure, called an electronic handshake, takes approximately 45 seconds for a cell phone to complete upon initial power up in a roaming area because neither the cell phone or cell transponder knows where that phone is and what mode it uses when it is turned on. At 500 miles an hour, the aircraft will travel three times the range of a cell phone’s five watt transmitter before this handshaking can occur. Though it is sometimes possible to connect during takeoff and landing, under the situation that was claimed the calls were impossible. The calls from the airplane were faked, no ifs or butts.

See: Planes of 911 Exceeded Their Software Limits

Also of notable significance, Hank Greenberg, a man whose links to 9/11 are strong, manages what has become perhaps the largest charity on Earth, thanks to Warren Buffett having donated the bulk of his fortune to it. What a guy!

Of course, Ptech is the Massachusetts (birthplace of Mitre and Lincoln Laboratories) software firm that had, as clients, Booz Allen, Mitre Corp., and Blessed Relief, a bin Laden charity.

Tax free, all of it! Even Mitre is a “not for profit” defense contractor.

image

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: